Patient Alleges Wrong Extraction, Inquiry Committee Formed
Srinagar: A major controversy has erupted at Government Dental College (GDC) Srinagar after a patient accused a doctor of extracting the wrong tooth during a procedure. The incident, which sparked public outrage, has led to the suspension of the doctor and the formation of a three-member inquiry committee to investigate the matter.
Patient’s Allegation Goes Viral
The patient, Nadeem Ahmad, claimed that the doctor mistakenly removed his healthy upper right tooth instead of the problematic lower right tooth. Frustrated by the mistake, Ahmad took to social media to share his ordeal, leading to widespread criticism of the dental college.
College Administration Responds
Reacting to the controversy, GDC Principal, Professor Aijaz Shah, confirmed that the involved doctor has been suspended while an investigation is underway.
“A senior professor, the Medical Superintendent, and the Administrative Officer have been assigned to investigate the incident and will submit their report within three days,” Dr. Shah stated.
He further reassured the public that patient care remains the top priority and any negligence will not be tolerated.
Suspended Doctor Defends Himself
The suspended doctor, Dr. Meeran, has refuted the allegations, claiming that the extraction was done as per protocol. He stated that:
- The treatment plan was discussed with Assistant Professor Dr. Altaf Hussain Malik.
- The patient himself pointed to the upper tooth when asked about his pain.
- Anesthesia was administered in the presence of an attendant and an assistant—yet no objections were raised at that stage.
- The consultant later confirmed that the correct tooth was extracted as a therapeutic procedure due to its positioning.
“I was following the consultant’s plan. The patient did not object at the time, but later claimed that the wrong tooth was removed. This seems like a misunderstanding,” Dr. Meeran stated.
Consultant’s Statement Backs Doctor
Assistant Professor Dr. Altaf Hussain Malik supported Dr. Meeran’s version, explaining that while the upper molar was healthy, it was malposed and required removal as a preventive measure to avoid future complications.
The final report from the inquiry committee is awaited, which will determine if the doctor was at fault or if the procedure was justified. Meanwhile, the incident has raised concerns over medical transparency and patient communication in dental procedures.
